MLB Expansion in Mexico City: How Much Deeper Would the Fences Have To Be?

 

MLB Commissioner Rob Manfred told CSN Chicago on Thursday that both Montreal and Mexico City are in the sights of the league for potential expansion to 32 teams.  Montreal would bring a team back to the city after they moved south in 2004. Mexico City, on the other hand, would be completely new and fascinating for a number of reasons.

 

First, it would be the first whole-hearted venture of a major professional sports league in any Latin American country. The NFL has played a regular season game in Mexico City, and the NBA has played three regular season games there. But the closest any league has come was MLB themselves when they sent the Montreal Expos to San Juan1 for 22 games in their final two seasons in Montreal.  An expansion team in Mexico City would be almost four times as many games as any league has ever tried to play outside of its “home” market.

 

While interesting, that’s not nearly as unique as the fact that Mexico City sits at an elevation of 7,380 feet. That’s a whopping 2,180 feet higher than Coors Field, a long dreaded destination for pitchers. This is even despite the fact that a humidor was installed in 2002 and has since reduced home runs to more typical levels.  Coors Field, as compared to its peers, has fences around 15 feet longer than the average in all dimensions to offset the altitude difference. A new MLB stadium in Mexico City would have to have much deeper fences.

 

SCIENCE TIME!

 

(Editor note: If you’re a scientist and take exception to any of the math below, please contact us so that we can offer a better resource!)

According to Wunderground, Mexico City’s average sea-level pressure, one of the key indicators of air density that is adjusted to an elevation of 0 feet/meters above Mean Sea Level, is 1022 hPa (30.17 inches of mercury), and the average temperature is 18 degrees C, about 64 degrees F.  By throwing these numbers together, we see that the density altitude of Mexico City on average is around 9,000 feet.

Density-altitude-for-Mexico-City-baseball-team

 

Presumably, a humidor similar to the one in Coors Field would be installed to remove the effect of humidity upon the equation, and we can assume that the 9100 foot or so density altitude is a representative value.  Using the 9100 feet value we found above, we’re able to determine that the air is nearly 25% thinner than at Sea Level. As a comparison, the air at Coors Field is 18% thinner.

 

What does this mean? Extrapolating the data from University of Illinois Physics Professor Emeritus (and apparently a big baseball fan), Alan Nathan’s analysis of Coors Field, it means a lot.

  • Due to thinner air, resistance slowing down pitches will lead to pitches being approximately 1.5 MPH faster than the same pitch at sea level. This shouldn’t affect too much.
  • However, pitches will break only 75% as much as they would at sea level. That nasty 18 inch break on an offspeed pitch is now only about a 13 inch break.  Junk ball pitchers beware!
  • A batted ball in Coors Field, according to Nathan, travels about 5% farther. This is close to what could be surmised from the dimensional differences of around 15 feet, though center field should really be about 20 feet back. Extrapolating this with the data we’ve calculated above about the air being 25% thinner in place of 18% in Denver, we can expect a value of nearly 7% additional flying distance for a batted ball.

 

With the average MLB left field wall at 332 feet, and the average right field wall at 328 feet, adding 7% to those values would be roughly 355 and 350, respectively. This is about the same distance as Wrigley Field down each foul line.  With center field averaging 404 feet, that would require a CF fence of 432 feet, still 4 feet shorter than Houston’s Minute Maid Park. Even still, with 355-432-350, Mexico City would have to have one of the largest outfields in baseball to defend, around 15% larger2 than the average 332-404-328 outfield.  That’s a lot more territory for three players.

 

Addendum: Professor Nathan was kind enough to comment and add his analysis and an amazing baseball physics Excel sheet and as come to the following conclusions: 32% lower air density than sea level, with a CF fence at about 440 feet, 10 feet farther than Coors Field.  Many thanks to Prof. Nathan for his help!!

 

In short, no matter how it plays out, should Mexico City get a MLB team in the next few years, expect there to be plenty of offense. The franchise may have trouble attracting talent irrespective of the altitude (while lifestyle in Mexico City can be quite nice, the perception is that it would not be a great place to live, perhaps unfairly), the extra altitude will likely scare pitchers from signing, which could end up being a self-fulfilling prophecy.  So my advice for any potential MLB owner in México DF? Stock up on big bats.

  1. I realize Puerto Rico isn’t a separate country than the US
  2. Depending upon the shape

Comments

2 responses to “MLB Expansion in Mexico City: How Much Deeper Would the Fences Have To Be?”

  1. Thanks to the author for a link to my article about baseball at Coors Field. I have written a much more recent article, with updated figures based on real data from MLB (http://www.hardballtimes.com/going-deep-on-goin-deep/). In that article, I find under “typical” conditions where a fly ball travels 400 ft at sea level will travel about 430 feet at Coors. If I use the same model to extrapolate to Mexico City, I find a distance of about 450 ft.

    1. Correction to my previous comment. I put in the wrong elevation for Mexico City. Should be 7380 rather than 9000. I assumed in all three cases a fixed temperature of 78 degrees. As a result, the distance should be 440 ft, or about 10 ft longer than Coors. I have the air density about 32% lower at 7380 than at sea level, all other things the same.