Newspapers unimpressed with Dolphins…. I, on the other hand…
The Dolphins managed to win their third preseason game by a score of 10-6. Not wholly impressive, but a win (in the meaningless preseason) nonetheless.
The Miami Herald, however, tends to disagree about the merits of the win. While sure, they make a point that perhaps our defense has come out a bit flat (whose doesn’t in 4 meaningless games when the starters are just trying not to get hurt,) but the Dolphins have shown the flashes of brilliance that got them in the playoffs last year. In the second quarter, Miami had the ball with under two minutes to go and ran a beautifully executed 2 minute drill to secure a field goal. The defense did manage to stabilize after the first quarter or so, and there were some typical rookie mistakes that you’ll find made by any of the other 31 teams.
What I think most people following the Dolphins fail to realize is that a bulk of the winning done by the team isn’t necessarily the result of being more talented than the teams faced, because that is not the case. The reason that the Dolphins have been successful in the past isn’t a gimmick offense, either. It’s a coaching staff that plays the game to their players’ strengths. We’ve seen it a lot in the college level where teams will develop a particular system (Hawaii’s spread, Arkansas’ Wildcat, etc) and find niche players who, while not as purely talented as other teams’ players, are more cohesive with the system. There have been small doses of this in the past in the NFL (Bill Walsh’s 49ers, for example) but Sparano really seems to be trying to revolutionize the way that teams develop gameday strategy.
I think too many people are counting out the Dolphins. I wouldn’t be surprised at all for them to win a few games they’re not expected to. They have the toughest schedule in the league, but I think they could still make a run at 11-5.
